Review of the Epidemiological Situation on Ixodic Tick-Borne Borrelioses in the Russian Federation in 2013–2022 and Forecast for 2023

The aim of the review was to characterize the epidemiological situation on ixodic tick-borne borreliosis (ITBB) in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in 2022, to forecast the development of the ITBB epidemic process in 2023 based on the analysis of its trends in the period of 2013–2022. In total, 7 264 cases of ITBB were registered in the Russian Federation in 2022, which is 1.9 times higher than the 2021-value. In all regions in 2022, after a sharp decrease in the level of registered morbidity during the “covid” phase of 2020–2021, there was an incidence raise to the pre-pandemic level. During 2013–2022, distinctive features of the trends in the development of the ITBB epidemic process in the territories of varying degree of epidemic hazard were retained. A downward tendency in the incidence rates was revealed in 14 out of 18 entities with a long-term average annual incidence (LTAA) of ITBB above 6.2 _{0 /0000}, with the exception of Moscow and the Kaluga Region, where a further increase in the incidence of ITBB is possible. In 6 out of 16 regions with LTAA _2013–2022 between 3.31 and 6.2 _{0 /0000}, an upward trend was observed, and in 8 – a decrease in morbidity. The trend towards an increase in morbidity was detected in 7 out of 21 entities with LTAA of ITBB from 1.21 to 3.3 _{0 /0000} and in 15 out of 26 regions with a low LTAA _2013–2022 (below 1.2 _{0 /0000}). The analysis of trends in the development of the ITBB epidemic process against the trends in changes in the frequency of contacts of the population with ticks, as well as calculations of the probable incidence rate allowed us to conclude that the incidence rate of ITBB in 2023 will range within the confidence intervals of long-term average annual values for the majority of the federal districts, with the exception of the Central Federal District, where an increase in the number of cases of ixodic tick-borne borreliosis is likely to occur, provided that the existing volumes of preventive measures are maintained and abnormal climatic phenomena absent. Effective control of the epidemic situation on the ITBB is attainable through preservation, and for such areas as Moscow, the Moscow Region, Voronezh, Kaluga, Orel, Ryazan, Penza and Rostov Regions, the Republic of Buryatia – increase in the volume of preventive measures, strengthening zoological and entomological monitoring of activity and structure of natural foci. There is an obvious need to develop algorithms for molecular-genetic monitoring of pathogens circulating in natural foci, and to focus attention onto the problems of diagnosis and prophylaxis of tick-borne transmissible infections.

1. Hussain S., Hussain A., Aziz U., Song B., Zeb J., George D., Li J., Sparagano O. The role of ticks in the emergence of Borrelia burgdorferi as a zoonotic pathogen and its vector control: a global systemic review. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(12):2412. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9122412.

2. Stanek G., Wormser G.P., Gray J., Strle F. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet. 2012; 379(9814):461–73. DOI: 10.1016/S01406736(11)60103-7.

3. Eisen L. Vector competence studies with hard ticks and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes: a review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020; 11(3):101359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101359.

4. Rudenko N., Golovchenko M., Grubhoffer L., Oliver J.H. Jr. Updates on Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex with respect to public health. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2011; 2(3):123–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.04.002.

5. Steinbrink A., Brugger K., Margos G., Kraiczy P., Klimpel S. The evolving story of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato transmission in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2022; 121(3):781–803. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07445-3.

6. Wang G. Borrelia burgdorferi and other Borrelia species. In: Yi-Wei Tang, Sussman Max, Dongyou Liu, Poxton Ian, Schwartzman Joseph, editors. Molecular Medical Microbiology. Second Edition. Boston: Academic Press; 2015. Vol. 3. P. 1867–909. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397169-2.00104-9.

7. Wang G., Liveris D., Mukherjee P., Jungnick S., Margos G., Schwartz I. Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferi. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2014; 34:12C.5.1-31. DOI: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc12c05s34.

8. Sprong H., Azagi T., Hoornstra D., Nijhof A.M., Knorr S., Baarsma M.E., Hovius J.W. Control of Lyme borreliosis and other Ixodes ricinus-borne diseases. Parasit. Vectors. 2018; 11(1):145. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2744-5.

9. Platonov A.E., Koetsveld J., Kolyasnikova N.M., Sarksyan D.S., Toporkova M.G., Shipulin G.A., Hovius J.W. [Microbiological evidence of etiology of “Ixodes tick-borne borreliosis without erythema migrans” – infection caused by Borrelia miyamotoi]. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika [Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention]. 2017; 16(1):29–35. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-1-29-35.

10. Kullberg B.J., Vrijmoeth H.D., van de Schoor F., Hovius J.W. Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1041. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1041.

11. Che T.L., Jiang B.G., Xu Q., Zhang Y.Q., Lv C.L., Chen J.J., Tian Y.J., Yang Y., Hay S.I., Liu W., Fang L.Q. Mapping the risk distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in China from 1986 to 2020: a geospatial modelling analysis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022; 11(1):1215–26. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2065930.

12. Wolcott K.A., Margos G., Fingerle V., Becker N.S. Host association of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: A review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021; 12(5):101766. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101766.

13. Korenberg E.I., Nefedova V.V., Fadeeva I.A., Gorelova N.B. [Major outcomes of Borrelia genotyping in Russia]. Vestnik Sibirskoi Meditsiny [Bulletin of Siberian Medicine]. 2006; 5(S1):87–92.

14. Schwartz A.M., Kugeler K.J., Nelson C.A., Marx G.E., Hinckley A.F. Use of commercial claims data for evaluating trends in Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010–2018. Emer. Infect. Dis. 2021; 27(2):499–507. DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.202728.

15. Korenberg E.I., Nefedova V.V., Romanenko V.N., Gorelova N.B. The tick Ixodes pavlovskyi as host of spirochetes pathogenic for humans and its possible role in the epizootiology and epidemiology of borrelioses. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010; 10(5):453–8. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0033.

16. Global vector control measures for 2017–2030 (version 5.4). Background paper for discussion at the 70th World Health Assembly. WHO; 2017. 64 p. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/documents/global-vector-control-response-2017-2030-0.

17. Sykes R.A., Makiello P. An estimate of Lyme borreliosis incidence in Western Europe. J. Public Health (Oxf.). 2017; 39(1):74– 81. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw017.

18. [On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2020. State Report]. Moscow: [Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumers’ Rights Protection and Human Well-being]; 2021. 256 p.

19. Rudakova S.A., Pen’evskaya N.A., Blokh A.I., Rudakov N.V., Trankvilevsky D.V., Savel’ev D.A., Teslova O.E., Kaneshova N.E. [Review of the epidemiological situation on ixodic tick-borne borreliosis in the Russian Federation in 2010–2020 and prognosis for 2021]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2021; (2):52–61. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-2-52-61.

20. Rudakov N.V., Pen’evskaya N.A., Kumpan L.V., Blokh A.I., Shpynov S.N., Trankvilevsky D.V., Shtrek S.V. [Epidemiological situation on tick-borne spotted fever group rickettsioses in the Russian Federation in 2012–2021, prognosis for 2022–2026]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2022; (1):54–63. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2022-1-54-63.

21. Washington State Department of Health: Guidelines for Using Confidence Intervals for Public Health Assessment. (Cited 01 Dec 2022). [Internet]. Available from: https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/1500/ConfIntGuide.pdf.

22. Jenks G.F. The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography. 1967; 7:186–90.