Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Improving Preventive (Anti-Epidemic) Measures to Reduce Biorisks while Training to Handle PBA of Pathogenicity Groups I–II

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2025-2-123-133

Abstract

Work with particularly dangerous pathogens is associated with occupational risks (the likelihood of manmade accidents, laboratory infection of workers) and requires the acquisition and improvement of knowledge, skills, and abilities in the safe performance of manipulations. One of the basic components of the biosafety system in training specialists is a set of regulated preventive (anti-epidemic) measures to reduce biorisk and promptly detect infection: medical examinations, vaccination and observation (upon indications), testing knowledge of biosafety rules, daily medical examination (interviewing, examination, thermometry). Gradual reduction, since 1990, in the practice hours of professional retraining of workers, from six to three months, while attaining the training objective – reliable and safe professional activity – necessitates increasing the intensity of development of skills and abilities in safe work and, accordingly, additional measures to reduce biorisk when working with pathogens for course participants who initially do not have professional skills and abilities. The aim of this study is to improve the set of preventive (anti-epidemic) measures to reduce the risk of man-made accidents and laboratory infections when training in safe work with pathogenic biological agents of groups I–II (PBA). The analysis of legislative, regulatory and methodological documents, by-laws, information and patent search in the field of ensuring biosafety of work with PBA and additional professional education has been carried out. A list of additional preventive (anti-epidemic) measures to the regulated set of measures to ensure biosafety has been proposed, training tools to reduce biorisk in practical classes have been developed: five training sets of strains of particularly dangerous bacteria and algorithms for their safe use; a set of standard operational microbiological procedures; methods of personalized assessment of professionally important qualities and individual model of safe behavior, levels of occupational health, preparedness, reliability of professional activity and risk of their decrement in a trainee.

About the Authors

T. A. Malyukova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



M. V. Gordeeva
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



E. V. Sazanova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



T. P. Shmel’kova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



E. V. Rastuntseva
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



G. V. Chekhovskaya
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



Z. L. Devdariani
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation

46, Universitetskaya St., Saratov, 410005



References

1. Dobrokhotskiy O.N., Dyatlov I.A. [The characteristics of health risk analysis when working with pathogenic biological agents]. Analiz Riska Zdorov’yu [Health Risk Analysis]. 2013; (1):24–9. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2013.1.03.

2. The International Biorisk Management Standard (CWA 15793:2008). Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard. Canada; 2008. 47 p.

3. Buyanov V.V., Suprun I.P. [Personal Protective Equipment for Work in Microbiological and Virological Laboratories]. Chernogolovka; 2001. 322 p.

4. Drozdov S.G., Garin N.S., Dzhindoyan L.S., Tarasenko V.M. [Fundamentals of Safety Ensuring in Microbiological and Virological Laboratories]. Moscow: ‘Medicine”; 1987. 256 p.

5. Kojima K., Bennett A., Blacksell S., Heisz M., Makison Booth C., McKinney M., Summermatter K. Laboratory Biosafety Manual. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. 124 p. DOI: 10.48350/150305.

6. Bang E., Oh S., Chang H.E., Shin I.S., Park K.U., Kim E.S. Zika Virus infection during research vaccine development: investigation of the laboratory-acquired infection via nanopore whole-genome sequencing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022; 12:819829. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.819829.

7. Blacksell S.D., Dhawan S., Kusumoto M., Le K.K., Summermatter K., O’Keefe J., Kozlovac J.P., Almuhairi S.S., Sendow I., Scheel C.M., Ahumibe A., Masuku Z.M., Bennett A.M., Kojima K., Harper D.R., Hamilton K. Laboratory-acquired infections and pathogen escapes worldwide between 2000 and 2021: a scoping review. Lancet. Microbe. 2024; 5(2):e194-e202. DOI: 10.1016/S26665247(23)00319-1.

8. Bobrov A.F., Martens V.K., Ipatov P.L., Sorokin A.V., Basov V.I. [Professional Reliability of NPP Personnel: Concept and Technology of Quantitative Assessment, Management Practice]. Saratov: Publishing house of the Saratov University; 2003. 232 p.

9. Duffey R.B., Saull J.W. The probability and management of human error. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/265153181_The_Probability_and_Management_of_Human_Error (дата обращения 26.12.2024). DOI: 10.1115/ICONE12-49287.

10. Martínez de Osés F.X., Ventikos N.P. A critical assessment of human element regarding maritime safety. (Cited 26 Dec 2024). [Internet]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33421049_A_Critical_Assessment_of_Human_Element_Regarding_Maritime_Safety.

11. Sazanova E.V., Boiko A.V., Malyukova T.A., Lotsmanova E.Yu. [Ways to reduce the likelihood of accidents during training of specialists to work with pathogens of I–II pathogenicity groups]. Biozashchita i Biobezopasnost’ [Biosecurity and Biosafety]. 2012; 4(1):16–20.

12. Salvendi G., editor. [Human Factors: in 6 volumes. Vol. 1. Ergonomics – a Complex Scientific and Technical Discipline]. Moscow: “Mir”; 1991. P. 526–99.

13. Lally Ph., van Jaarsveld C.H.M., Potts H.W.W., Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2010; 40:998–1009. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.674.

14. Briko N.I., Onishchenko G.G., Pokrovsky V.I., editors. [Guidelines on the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases]: [in 2 volumes]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Medical Information Agency; 2019. 880 p.

15. Tikhomirova L.A., Malyukova T.A., Panteleev A.F., Lotsmanova E.Yu., Boiko A.V. [Job descriptions of employees of medical and biological institutions admitted to work with pathogenic biological agents (PBA) of groups I–II]. Biozashchita i Biobezopasnost’ [Biosecurity and Biosafety]. 2011; 3(4):44–50.

16. Laboratory Biosecurity Guidance. WHO; 2024. 110 p.

17. Dobrokhotsky O.N., Kolombet L.V. [Ensuring biological safety when working with pathogenic biological agents based on biorisk assessment and management]. Gigiena i Sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation]. 2010; (5):79–81.

18. Malyukova T.A. [Monitoring psychophysiological adaptation of specialists working with pathogenic biological agents of groups I–II]. Bakteriologiya [Bacteriology]. 2019; 4(2):37–41. DOI: 10.20953/2500-1027-2019-2-37-41.


Review

For citations:


Malyukova T.A., Gordeeva M.V., Sazanova E.V., Shmel’kova T.P., Rastuntseva E.V., Chekhovskaya G.V., Devdariani Z.L. Improving Preventive (Anti-Epidemic) Measures to Reduce Biorisks while Training to Handle PBA of Pathogenicity Groups I–II. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2025;(2):123-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2025-2-123-133

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)