Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Ixodidae Tick-Borne Borrelioses in the World. Epidemiological Situation in the Russian Federation in 2025 in Comparison with Long-Term Data and Forecast for 2026

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2026-2-18-33

Abstract

An overview of the epidemiological situation on Ixodidae tick-borne borreliosis (ITBB) in the world and the Russian Federation in 2025 in comparison with long-term values is presented. A forecast for 2026 is made. In 2025, the maximum number of ITBB cases was registered in the Russian Federation (9,698) over the past 15 years. Relative to the long-term average, the incidence rates of ITBB increased in 4 federal districts: Central (CFD), Volga, Southern (SFD) and North-Caucasian (NCFD) ones; the proportion of CFD in the overall structure of ITBB incidence expanded significantly (55.43 %). The number of constituent entities with a reported incidence of ITBB has risen to 84, and an increase in incidence has been noted in half of them. During the period of 2013–2025, the peculiarities of trends in the epidemic process of ITBB in territories of varying degrees of epidemiological risk persisted. In the majority of entities with a long-term average annual incidence (LTAA) above 8.4 0 /0000, a downward trend or relative stability in the incidence of ITBB has been revealed, with the exception of Moscow and the Kaluga Region, where a pronounced upward trend was noted. In 10 out of 19 regions with LTAA between 4.2 and 8.3 0 /0000, an upward trend was observed, while in 8 – a decrease in morbidity. The trend towards an increase in the incidence of ITBB was detected in 14 out of 24 entities with LTAA from 1.6 to 4.1 0 /0000 and in 19 of the 29 regions with low LTAA (up to 1.5 0 /0000). The analysis of trends in the development of the epidemic process and calculations of the probable incidence rate allows us to conclude that for most federal districts, the incidence rate of ITBB in 2026 will vary around the confidence intervals of the long-term average values, with the exception of the CFD, SFD and NCFD, where an increase in the number of cases of ITBB is probable. Effective control of the epidemic situation on ITBB is possible provided that it is maintained and enhanced. For regions such as Moscow, Saint Petersburg; Moscow, Voronezh, Lipetsk, Nizhny Novgorod, Kostroma, Ryazan, Tula, Kaluga, Bryansk, Kirov, Kursk, Orel, Tver, Tyumen, Penza and Irkutsk Regions, Altai and Trans-Baikal Territories, the Republics of Buryatia and Mordovia, constituent entities of the Southern Federal District and the North-Caucasian Federal District, increase in the volume and improvement of the quality of preventive measures, including hygienic education of the population, strengthening zoological and entomological monitoring of the activity and structure of natural foci, are required.

About the Authors

N. A. Pen’evskaya
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



O. E. Teslova
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



Yu. F. Kuz’menko
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



A. I. Blokh
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



N. V. Rudakov
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



D. V. Trankvilevsky
Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology; Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Russian Federation

19a, Varshavskoe Highway, Moscow, 117105;
Moscow



S. V. Shtrek
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections; Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080;
12, Lenina St., Omsk



D. A. Savel’ev
Omsk Research Institute of Natural-Focal Infections
Russian Federation

7, Mira Avenue, Omsk, 644080



References

1. Korenberg E.I., Pomelova V.G., Osin N.S. [Natural-Focal Infections Transmitted by Ixodes Ticks]. Moscow; 2013. 464 p.

2. Margos G., Hepner S., Fingerle V. Characteristics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. In: Hunfeld K.-P., Gray J., editors. Lyme Borreliosis. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2022. P. 1–29. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93680-8_1.

3. Rodino K.G., Pritt B.S. When to think about other borreliae: Hard tick relapsing fever (Borrelia miyamotoi), Borrelia mayonii, and beyond. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2022; 36(3):689–701. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2022.04.002.

4. Zaitseva O.A., Volynkina A.S., Vasil’eva O.V., Chekhvalova E.V., Kolosov A.V., Prislegina D.A., Manin E.A., Kulichenko A.N. [Geno-species composition of Borrelia circulating on the Black Sea Coast of the Krasnodar Territory]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2024; (1):141–7. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2024-1-141-147.

5. Kuleshov K.V., Margos G., Fingerle V., Koetsveld J., Goptar I.A., Markelov M.L., Kolyasnikova N.M., Sarksyan D.S., Kirdyashkina N.P., Shipulin G.A., Hovius J.W., Platonov A.E. Whole genome sequencing of Borrelia miyamotoi isolate Izh-4: reference for a complex bacterial genome. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6388-4.

6. Hussain S., Hussain A., Aziz U., Song B., Zeb J., George D., Li J., Sparagano O. The role of ticks in the emergence of Borrelia burgdorferi as a zoonotic pathogen and its vector control: a global systemic review. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(12):2412. DOI: 10.3390/ microorganisms9122412.

7. Barbour A.G., Benach J.L. Discovery of the Lyme disease agent. mBio. 2019; 10(5):e02166-19. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02166-19.

8. Burgdorfer W., Barbour A.G., Hayes S.F., Benach J.L., Grunwaldt E., Davis J.P. Lyme disease – a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science. 1982; 216(4552):1317–9. DOI: 10.1126/science.7043737.

9. Bennett N.J. Lyme Disease. In: Domachowske J., edi- tor. Introduction to Clinical Infectious Diseases. A Problem-Based Approach. Springer; 2019. P. 343–54. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91080-2_32.

10. Steere A.C., Malawista S.E., Snydman D.R., Shope R.E., Andiman W.A., Ross M.R., Steele FM. Lyme arthritis: an epidemic of oligoarticular arthritis in children and adults in three Connecticut communities. Arthritis Rheum. 1977; 20(1):7–17. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780200102.

11. Benach J.L., Bosler E.M., Hanrahan J.P., Coleman J.L., Habicht G.S., Bast T.F., Cameron D.J., Ziegler J.L., Barbour A.G., Burgdorfer W., Edelman R., Kaslow R.A. Spirochetes isolated from the blood of two patients with Lyme disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 308(13):740–2. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198303313081302.

12. Steere A.C., Grodzicki R.L., Kornblatt A.N., Craft J.E., Barbour A.G., Burgdorfer W., Schmid G.P., Johnson E., Malawista S.E. The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 308(13):733–40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198303313081301.

13. Barbour A.G. Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spi- rochetes. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1984; 57(4):521–5.

14. Stanek G., Strle F. Lyme borreliosis – from tick bite to diagnosis and treatment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018; 42(3):233–58. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fux047.

15. Fukunaga M., Takahashi Y., Tsuruta Y., Matsushita O., Ralph D., McClelland M., Nakao M. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi sp. nov., isolated from the ixodid tick Ixodes persulcatus, the vector for Lyme disease in Japan. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1995; 45(4):804–10. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-45-4-804.

16. Platonov A.E., Karan L.S., Kolyasnikova N.M., Makhneva N.A., Toporkova M.G., Maleev V.V., Fish D., Krause P.J. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011; 17(10):1816–23. DOI: 10.3201/ eid1710.101474.

17. Krause P.J., Fish D., Narasimhan S., Barbour A.G. Borrelia miyamotoi infection in nature and in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015; 21(7):631–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.006.

18. Kubiak K., Szczotko M., Dmitryjuk M. Borrelia miyamotoi – an emerging human tick-borne pathogen in Europe. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(1):154. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9010154.

19. Rodino K.G., Theel E.S., Pritt B.S. Tick-borne diseases in the United States. Clin. Chem. 2020; 66(4):537–548. DOI: 10.1093/ clinchem/hvaa040.

20. [On the State of Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population in the Russian Federation in 2024: State Report]. Moscow: Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumers Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; 2025. 424 p.

21. Alieva E.E., Gafarova M.T., Ageeva E.S., Ivantsova N.L., Ermachkova P.A., Kravchenko A.N., Titova M.S. [Recurrent fever caused by B. miyamotoi: history, epidemiology, diagnosis]. Tavricheskij Mediko-Biologicheskij Vestnik [Tauride Medical and Biological Bulletin]. 2024; 27(4):46–57. DOI: 10.29039/2070-8092-2024-27-4-46-57.

22. Farina J.M., Baranchuk A. Lyme diseases epidemiology: update 2022. In: Baranchuk A., Wamboldt R., Wang C.N., editors. Lyme Carditis. From A to Z. Springer; 2023. P. 5–15. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-41169-4_2.

23. Burn L., Fletcher M.A., Montiel J., Ghia C.J., Dantas A., Kelly P.H., Stark J.H. Lyme borreliosis and tick surveil- lance epidemiology in the WHO regions of the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific: a systematic literature review (2005–2022) beyond North America (Canada, United States of America), European Union countries, and China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025; 25(11):627–43. DOI: 10.1177/15303667251364142.

24. Nuttens C., Bessou A., Duret S., Skufca J., Blanc E., Pilz A., Gessner B.D., Faucher J.F., Stark J.H. Epidemiology of Lyme borreliosis in France in primary care and hospital settings, 2010–2019. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023; 23(4):221–9. DOI: 10.1089/ vbz.2022.0050.

25. Stark J.H., Pilz A., Jodar L., Moïsi J.C. The epidemiology of Lyme borreliosis in Europe: an updated review on a growing pub- lic health issue. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023; 23(4):139–41. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0068.

26. Kugeler K.J., Schwartz A.M., Delorey M.J., Mead P.S., Hinckley A.F. Estimating the frequency of Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021; 27(2):616–9. DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.202731.

27. Mead P.S. Epidemiology of Lyme disease. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2015; 29(2):187–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.010.

28. Canada.ca. The official website of the Government of Canada. Lyme disease: Monitoring. (Cited 19 Mar 2026). [Internet]. Avaiable from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/lyme-disease/surveillance-lyme-disease.html.

29. Steinbrink A., Brugger K., Margos G., Kraiczy P., Klimpel S. The evolving story of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato transmission in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2022; 121(3):781–803. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07445-3.

30. Davidson A., Davis J., Brestrich G., Moisi J.C., Jodar L., Stark J.H. Lyme borreliosis incidence across Europe, 2015–2023: a surveillance-based review and analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025; 25(10):569–79. DOI: 10.1177/15303667251363125.

31. ECDC. Surveillance Atlas of Infectious Diseases. (Cited 23 Jan 2026) [Internet]. Available from: https://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx.

32. Lee W.C., Lee M.J., Choi K.H., Chung H.S., Choe N.H. A comparative study of the trends in epidemiological aspects of Lyme disease infections in Korea and Japan, 2011–2016. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2019; 56(3):268–71. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9062.289396.

33. Kim D.H., Hwang J.H., Lim S.K., Kim J. [Characteristics of Lyme disease in Korea between 2019 and 2023]. Jugan Geongang Gwa Jilbyeong. 2024; 17(39):1654–70. DOI: 10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.39.2.

34. Ohira M., Takano A., Yoshi K., Arai A., Aso Y., Furutani R., Hamano T., Takahashi-Iwata I., Kaneko Ch., Matsuura T., Maeda N., Nakajima H., Shindo K., Suenaga T., Sugie K., Suzuki Y., Yamashita T., Angulo F.J., Edwards J., Bender C.M., Harper L.R., Nakayama Y., Ito S., Pilz A., Stark J.H., Moïsi J.C., Mizusawa H., Takao M. Lyme neuroborreliosis in Japan: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato as a cause of meningitis of previously undetermined etiology in hospitalized pa- tients outside of the island of Hokkaido, 2010–2021. Eur. J. Neurol. 2025; 32(1):e70005. DOI: 10.1111/ene.70005.

35. Teh K.J., Tang H.Y., Lim L.S., Pung H.S., Gan S.Y., Lai N.S. Mini review: surveillance of Lyme borreliosis in Southeast Asia and method of diagnosis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023; 27(10):4378–85. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32443.

36. Song J., Dong Y., Zhang Y., Zhou G., Wu X., Gao L., Wu H., Peng L., Yang J., Ji Z., Li B., Fan Y., Chen J., Liu M., Kong J., Ma W., Zhong L., Ma W., Liu A., Bao F. Seroprevalence of Lyme disease in Asian human populations: a systematic review and me- ta-analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025; 25(7):444–53. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2024.0092.

37. Stark J.H., Li X., Zhang J.C., Burn L., Valluri S.R., Liang J., Pan K., Fletcher M.A., Simon R., Jodar L., Gessner B.D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Lyme disease data and seropositivity for Borrelia burgdorferi, China, 2005‒2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022; 28(12):2389–97. doi: 10.3201/eid2812.212612.

38. Dong Y., Zhou G., Cao W., Xu X., Zhang Y., Ji Z., Yang J., Chen J., Liu M., Fan Y., Kong J., Wen S., Li B., Yue P., Liu A., Bao F. Global seroprevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in human populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob. Health. 2022; 7(6):e007744. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007744.

39. Burn L., Pilz A., Vyse A., Gutiérrez Rabá A.V., Angulo F.J., Tran T.M.P., Fletcher M.A., Gessner B.D., Moïsi J.C., Stark J.H. Seroprevalence of lyme borreliosis in europe: results from a systematic literature review (2005–2020). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023; 23(4):195–220. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0069.

40. Rudakova S.A., Pen’evskaya N.A., Blokh A.I., Rudakov N.V., Trankvilevsky D.V., Savel’ev D.A., Teslova O.E., Kaneshova N.E. [Review of the epidemiological situation on ixodic tick-borne borreliosis in the Russian Federation in 2010–2020 and prognosis for 2021]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2021; (2):52–61. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-2-52-61.

41. [Report on climate features in the Russian Federation for 2024]. Moscow; 2025. 135 p. [Internet]. Available from: https:// cc.voeikovmgo.ru/images/sobytiya/2025/04/Doklad_o_klimate_RF_2024_with_cover.pdf.

42. [Reviews of weather and climate patterns observed in the Northern Hemisphere in 2001–2025]. [Internet]. Available from: https://meteoinfo.ru/climat-tabl3.

43. Rudakova S.A., Pen’evskaya N.A., Rudakov N.V., Pakskina N.D., Savel’ev D.A., Blokh A.I. [Intensity and trends in development of epidemic process of ixodes tick-borne borrelioses in the Russian Federation in 2002–2018 and forecast for 2019]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2019; (2):22–9. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2019-2-22-29.


Review

For citations:


Pen’evskaya N.A., Teslova O.E., Kuz’menko Yu.F., Blokh A.I., Rudakov N.V., Trankvilevsky D.V., Shtrek S.V., Savel’ev D.A. Ixodidae Tick-Borne Borrelioses in the World. Epidemiological Situation in the Russian Federation in 2025 in Comparison with Long-Term Data and Forecast for 2026. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2026;(2):18-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2026-2-18-33

Views: 185

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)