Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Improvement of the Normative-Regulatory Framework Concerning Anti-Epidemic Procedures for Works with Infectious Disease Agents in Mobile Laboratories of Specialized Anti-Epidemic Teams (SAET)

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-2-14-18

Abstract

Carried out is a range of investigations aimed at the improvement of the anti-epidemic procedures for works with infectious disease agents (herein biological safety provision) in mobile laboratories of specialized anti-epidemic teams (SAET). Evaluation of the operational experience of stationary and field laboratories, as well as comparative analysis of the national safety requirements for works with pathogenic biological agents and WHO international regulations in the sphere of biological safety provision in laboratories, has made it possible to outline common for all types of microbiological laboratories principles for biosafety provision. With due consideration of these principles formulated are the core requirements for the provision of biological safety of SAET activities. Based on the results of biorisk and biohazard assessment which have to do with innovative mobile laboratories, worked out is a system of anti-epidemic procedures aimed towards establishment of the conditions that offer as low as practically achievable level of risk for personnel of SAET mobile laboratories, for population and human environment too. These practices, designed for biological safety provision among the personnel of mobile laboratories (ML), have been played back in a number of standard operational procedures. With a view to establishing of the environment with acceptable level of biorisk for the personnel and population when ML are used for various purposes and in various contingencies (in full force, single unit or several modules), worked out are the algorithms of decision-making support as regards selection of modules and optional accessories. However, there is a need for emergency response plans and training programs for the personnel on the provision of biosafety in ML to ensure and maintain acceptable level of biorisk connected with ML functioning.

About the Authors

M. V. Gordeeva
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


M. N. Lyapin
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


I. G. Karnaukhov
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


E. S. Kazakova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


I. N. Sharova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


A. V. Toporkov
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


References

1. Basakov M.I. [Foundations of standardization, metrology, and certification: lecture notes]. Rostov-on-Don; 2002. 192 p.

2. [Safety of works with microorganisms of the III–IV groups of pathogenicity (hazard groups). Sanitary-and-epidemiological regulations]. SR 1.3.1285-03. Byul. Norm. Metod. Dokum. Gossanepidnadzora 2003; 3(13): 45–144.

3. [Safety of works with microorganisms of the III–IV groups of pathogenicity (hazard groups) and parasitic disease agents. Sanitary-andepidemiological regulations]. SR 1.3.2322-08. M.: Rospotrebnadzor Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology; 2009. 75 p.

4. Lyapin M.N., Ezhov I.N., Drozdov I.G., Kutyrev V.V. [Evolution of the views on the issue of biosafety, and fostering of a new specialized hemisphere of knowledge]. Mol. Med. 2006; 3:14–9.

5. [Methodological recommendations on the development of practical guidelines as regards quality insurance system at the control laboratory of the institution]. WHO, 1998 [cited 21 Dec 2012]. Available from: whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_VSQ_rus.pdf.

6. Onischenko G.G., Toporkov A.V., Toporkov V.P., Koulichenko A.N., Kutyrev V.V. [Specialized anti-epidemic teams (SAET): the experience of work and tactics of their employment in modern conditions]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2008; (98):5–11.

7. Pchelintseva M.V., Lyapin M.N. [Normative provision of biosafety of the specialized anti-epidemic teams functioning]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2009; (102):21–32.

8. Pchelintseva M.V., Lyapin M.N., Ezhov I.N., Toporkov A.V. [Application of risk assessment methodology for substantiation of measures complex on provision of safe functioning of mobile laboratories of specialized anti-epidemic teams]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2011; (108):22–6.

9. Guidelines on Standard Operating Procedures for Microbiology. WHO, 2006 [cited 21 Dec 2010]. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/en/Section10/Section17/Section53/Section482.htm

10. Laboratory biorisk management standard. CWA 15793:2008 E /ICS 07.100.01 [Internet]. CEN; 2008 [cited 10 Nov 2010]. Available from: ftp://ftp.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/workshop31/CWA 15793.pdf

11. Laboratory Biosafety Manual. WHO; 2004 [cited 10 Apr 2012]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/biosafety/Biosafety7.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Gordeeva M.V., Lyapin M.N., Karnaukhov I.G., Kazakova E.S., Sharova I.N., Toporkov A.V. Improvement of the Normative-Regulatory Framework Concerning Anti-Epidemic Procedures for Works with Infectious Disease Agents in Mobile Laboratories of Specialized Anti-Epidemic Teams (SAET). Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2013;(2):14-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-2-14-18

Views: 681


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)