Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Assessment of Animal Sensitivity to Particularly Dangerous Orthopoxviruses, Using Primary Cultures of Lung Cells

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2016-1-75-78

Abstract

Objective of the study is to investigate the sensitivity of different animals to highly pathogenic Orthopoxviruses applying techniques, based on utilization of primary cultures of lung cells, and to assess the possibility of further deployment of this approach. Materials and methods. Cultural and virological research methods are used. Results and conclusions. Performed is the assessment of sensitivity of outbred mice, marmots and chickens to variola virus (VV) and monkeypox virus (MPV), using suspended primary cultures of lung cells (SPCLC) of these animals. Through inoculation of the mentioned above cell cultures with VV and MPV in a dose of 0.00001 PFU per a cell (plaque forming unit /cell) demonstrated has been virus replication with maximum concentration values in all cases (1,4 - 2,0 lg PFU/ml), mainly 3 days after infection. According to the data on SPCLC, sensitivity to VV in mice, marmots and chickens (ID50 - 50 % infective dose) amounts to (1,3 ± 0,5) lg PFU; (2,3 ± 0,5) lg PFU; and (0,0 ± 0,4) lg PFU respectively, taking into account unhindered interaction of the virus with permissive lung cells in the organism of the animals. As for MPV values for this indicator, they are: (1,7 ± 0,3) lg PFU for mice, and (0,5 ± 0,3) lg PFU - for marmots. Obtained ID50 values for VV using mice SPCLC and for MPV using mice and marmots SPCLC coincide with the ones, studied in direct experiments on intranasal infection with the viruses, with regard to 10 % of the viral application in lungs when deploying the latter method of infection. The fact testifies to the possibility of further deployment of this method for the assessment of animal sensitivity to highly pathogenic Orthopoxviruses based on the results of in vitro experiments.

About the Authors

A. S. Zamedyanskaya
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


Al. A. Sergeev
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


K. A. Titova
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


A. S. Kabanov
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


L. E. Bulychev
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


Ar. A. Sergeev
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


A. E. Nesterov
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


O. V. Nosareva
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


D. O. Galakhova
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


L. N. Shishkina
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


A. P. Agafonov
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


A. N. Sergeev
State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”
Russian Federation


References

1. Zaks L. [Statistical Assessment]. M.: Statistics; 1976. 598 p.

2. Zhukov V.A., Shishkina L.N., Safatov A.S., Sergeev A.A., P’yankov O.V., Petrishchenko V.A., Zaitsev B.N., Toporkov V.S., Sergeev A.N., Nesvizhsky Yu.V., Vorob’ev A.A. [Validation of the modified algorithm for forecasting host-susceptibility to viruses with regard to sensitivity indexes for primary cultures of target-cells and innate immunity factors]. RAMS Bulletin. 2010; (5):24–9.

3. Sergeev Al.A., Kabanov A.S., Bulychev L.E., P’yankov O.V., Sergeev Ar.A., Taranov O.S., Bodnev S.A., Tumanov Yu.V., Shishkina L.N., Agafonov A.P., Sergeev A.N. [Mice as animal model for evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of preparations against Monkeypox]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2013; 2:60–5.

4. Sergeev Al.A., Bulychev L.E., P’yankov O.V., Sergeev Ar.A., Bodnev S.A., Kabanov A.S., Tumanov Yu.V., Yurganova I.A., Shishkina L.N., Agafonov A.P., Sergeev A.N. [Sensitivity of different animal species to monkeypox virus]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2012; 1:88–92.

5. Goff A.J., Chapman J., Foster C., Wlazlowski C., Shamblin J., Lin K., Kreiselmeier N., Mucker E., Paragas J., Lawler J., Hensley L. A novel respiratory model of infection with monkeypox virus in cynomolgus macaques. J. Virol. 2011; 85(10):4898–909. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02525-10.

6. Guarner J., Johnson B.J., Paddock C.D., Shieh W.J., Goldsmith C.S., Reynolds M.G., Damon I.K., Regnery R.L., Zaki S.R. Monkeypox transmission and pathogenesis in prairie dogs. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004; 10(3):426–31. DOI: 10.3201/eid1003.030878.

7. Leparc-Goffart I., Poirier B., Garin D., Tissier M-H., Fuchs F., Crance J-M. Standartization of a neutralizing anti-vaccinia antibodies titration method: an essential step for titration of vaccinia immunoglobulins and smallpox vaccines evaluation. J. Clin. Virol. 2005; 32(1):47–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.07.005.

8. Wahl-Jensen V., Cann J.A., Rubins K.H., Huggins J.W., Fisher R.W., Johnson A.J., de Kok-Mercado F., Larsen T., Raymond J.L., Hensley L.E., Jahrling P.B. Progression of pathogenic events in cynomolgus macaques infected with variola virus. PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e24832. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024832.


Review

For citations:


Zamedyanskaya A.S., Sergeev A.A., Titova K.A., Kabanov A.S., Bulychev L.E., Sergeev A.A., Nesterov A.E., Nosareva O.V., Galakhova D.O., Shishkina L.N., Agafonov A.P., Sergeev A.N. Assessment of Animal Sensitivity to Particularly Dangerous Orthopoxviruses, Using Primary Cultures of Lung Cells. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2016;(1):75-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2016-1-75-78

Views: 799


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)