Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Improvement and Standardization of Laboratory Diagnostics Procedures as Concerns Particularly Dangerous, “Emerging”, and “Reemerging” Infectious Diseases

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-2-46-48

Abstract

Represented are the data on the key stages of laboratory diagnostics practices standardization as regards particularly dangerous infectious diseases and on the improvement of the normative-regulatory framework on the procedure for organization and carrying out laboratory diagnostics in accordance with three-level system. Worked out are the principles, scheme of indication and identification of pathogenic biological agents of emerging, previously unknown, and atypical microorganisms using modern computerized systems and high-tech equipment.

About the Authors

I. N. Sharova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


E. S. Kazakova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


S. A. Portenko
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


T. Yu. Krasovskaya
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


N. A. Osina
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


V. E. Kuklev
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


I. G. Karnaukhov
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


S. A. Shcherbakova
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


A. V. Toporkov
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


M. V. Chesnokova
Irkutsk Research Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and Far East
Russian Federation


A. N. Kulichenko
Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation


V. V. Kutyrev
Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”
Russian Federation


References

1. Onishchenko G.G., Kutyrev V.V., editors. [Laboratory Diagnostics of Particularly Dangerous Infectious Diseases. Practice Guidelines]. M.: Meditsina, Shiko; 2009. 472 p.

2. Bochner B.R. Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009; 33(1): 91–205.

3. Crowley E., Bird P., Fisher K., Goetz K., Boyle M., Benzinger M.J. Jr., Juenger M., Agin J., Goins D., Johnson R. Evaluation of the VITEK 2

4. Gram-negative (GN) microbial identification test card: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2012; 95(3):778–85.

5. Drevinek M., Dresler J., Klimentova J., Pisa L., Hubalek M. Evaluation of sample preparation methods for MALDI-TOF MS identification of highly dangerous bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2012; 55(1):40–6.

6. Farfoura E., Leto J., Barritaulta M., Barberis C., Meyer J., Dauphin B., Le Guern A.-S., Leflиche A., Badell E., Guiso N., Leclercq A., Le Monnier A., Lecuit M., Rodriguez-Nava V., Bergeron E., Raymond J., Vimont S., Bille E., Carbonnelle E., Guet-Revillet H., Lйcuyer H., Beretti J.-L., Vay C., Berche P., Ferroni A., Nassif X., Join-Lambert O. Evaluation of the Andromas Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System for Identification of Aerobically Growing Gram-Positive Bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012; 50(8):2702–7.

7. Ferreira L., Castan S.V., Sanchez-Juanes F., Gonzalez-Cabrero S., Menegotto F., Orduna-Domingo A., Gonzalez-Buitrago J.M., Munoz-Bellido J.L. Identification of Brucella by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Fast and reliable identification from agar plates and blood cultures. PLoS One. 2010; 5:14235

8. Grif K., Dierich M.P., Much P., Hofer E., Allerberger F. Identifying and subtyping species of dangerous pathogens by automated ribotyping. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2003; 47:13–20.

9. Grundt А., Findeisen P., Miethke T., Jäger E., Ahmad-Nejad P., Neumaier M. Rapid Detection of ampicillin resistance in Escherichia coli by quantitative mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012; 50(5):1727–9.

10. Janda J.M., Abbott S.L. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007; 49(9):2761–4.

11. Köser C.U., Ellington M.J., Cartwright E.J.P., Gillespie S.H., Brown N.M., Farrington M., Holden M.T.G., Dougan G., Bentley S.D., Parkhill J., Peacock S.J. Routine Use of Microbial Whole Genome Sequencing in Diagnostic and Public Health Microbiology. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8(8):е1002824.

12. Winstanley T.T., Courvalin P. Expert Systems in Clinical Microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011; 24(3):515–56. 12. Wolk D.M., Dunne W.M. Jr. New Technologies in Clinical Microbiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011; 49(9):62–7.


Review

For citations:


Sharova I.N., Kazakova E.S., Portenko S.A., Krasovskaya T.Yu., Osina N.A., Kuklev V.E., Karnaukhov I.G., Shcherbakova S.A., Toporkov A.V., Chesnokova M.V., Kulichenko A.N., Kutyrev V.V. Improvement and Standardization of Laboratory Diagnostics Procedures as Concerns Particularly Dangerous, “Emerging”, and “Reemerging” Infectious Diseases. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2013;(2):46-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-2-46-48

Views: 703


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)