Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Isolation, Purification and Evaluation of Serological Activity of Rabies Virus Antigens

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2017-4-27-31

Abstract

Objective of the study is to evaluate the serological activity of rabies virus antigens isolated from the brain tissue of mice by homogenization on FastPrep followed by ultracentrifugation. Materials and methods. Producer strain of the rabies virus “Ovechiy” GNKI. The rabies virus was isolated from the brain tissue of experimentally infected mice, followed by the study of the electrophoretic profile. The serological activity of the virus components was assessed by immunoblot and ELISA using specific anti-rabies sera.
Results and conclusions. In the course of comparing the methods of isolation and purification of the rabies virus antigen, it was found that most optimal one is to use a homogenization on FastPrep-24, followed by fractionation in a sucrose gradient. As a result of fractionation in a graded sucrose density gradient with a concentration of 15–50 % at 25000 g for 120 min, five fractions of the rabies virus components were obtained. The maximum purified protein fraction was from 15–20 % sucrose zone, which corresponded to a molecular weight of 67 kDa. The specific antigen activity of the fraction in ELISA reached up the titers of 1:1280 (Specificity coefficient 2.2).
Using immunoblot of antigens, obtained from the sucrose gradient in the range of 40–45 % and 20–35 % after ultracentrifugation, one major fraction of polypeptides (54 kDa) was detected, which showed the highest antigenic activity. The results obtained will be useful in the design of test systems for rabies screening and monitoring the effectiveness of anti-epizootic measures.

About the Authors

M. A. Efimova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
Russian Federation

Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation



K. S. Khaertynov
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety; Kazan State Medical Academy – Affiliated Branch of Federal State-Funded Educational Institution for Further Vocational Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Education”, RF Ministry of Health
Russian Federation

Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation

36 Butlerova St., Kazan, Tatarstan, 420012, Russian Federation.



A. F. Arslanova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
Russian Federation
Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation


R. M. Akhmadeev
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
Russian Federation
Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation


A. I. Nikitin
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
Russian Federation
Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation


V. G. Gumerov
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
Russian Federation
Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation


E. A. Shuralev
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety; Kazan State Medical Academy – Affiliated Branch of Federal State-Funded Educational Institution for Further Vocational Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Education”, RF Ministry of Health; Kazan (Privolzhsky) Federal University
Russian Federation

Nauchniy Gorodok-2. Kazan, Tatarstan, 420075, Russian Federation

36 Butlerova St., Kazan, Tatarstan, 420012, Russian Federation

18, Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan, Tatarstan, 420008, Russian Federation



References

1. Abramova E.G., Generalov S.V., Matveeva Z.V., Zhulidov I.M., Nikiforov A.K., Komissarov A.V. [Experimental substantiation of cultural technologies introduction into manufacturing of anti-rabies immunoglobulin]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2016; 2:95–101. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2016-2-95-101.

2. Belchikhina A.V., Karaulov A.K. [Retrospective analysis of rabies epizootic situation in animals in the territory of the Russian Federation]. Veterinariya Segodnya. 2016; 1(16):64–70.

3. Generalov S.V., Abramova E.G., Matveeva Zh.V., Zhulidov I.M., Savitskaya L.V., Lobovikova O.A. [Optimization of specifications for scaledup fixed rabies virus cultivation (“Moscow 3253” strain) in Vero cell culture]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2014; 2:101–3.

4. Gulyukin A.M., Shabeikin A.A., Zaikova O.N., Polyakova I.V., Zaberezhny A.D., Khismatullina N.A., Samerkhanov I.I. [Epidemiological features and molecular-genetic characterization of rabies virus isolates in the Republic of Tatarstan]. Veterinarny Vrach. 2015; 6:3–11.

5. Kondrakhin I.P., Kurilov N.V., Malakhov A.G., Arkhipov A.V., Belov A.D., Belyakov I.M., Blinov N.I., Korobov A.V., Frolova L.A., Sevast’yanova N.A. [Clinical laboratory diagnostics in veterinary medicine: reference edition]. Moscow: “Agropromizdat”; 1985. 287 p.

6. Shabeikin A.A., Zaikova O.N., Gulyukin A.M. [Overview of epizootic situation on rabies between 1991 and 2015 in the Russian Federation]. Veterinariya Kubani. 2016; 4:4–6.

7. Chacko K., Parakadavathu R.T., Al-Maslamani M., Nair A.P., Chekura A.P., Madhavan I. Diagnostic difficulties in human rabies: A case report and review of the literature. Qatar Med. J. 2017; 2016(2):15. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2016.15.

8. Duong V., Tarantola A., Ong S., Mey C., Choeung R., Ly S., Bourhy H., Dussart P., Buchy P. Laboratory diagnostics in dog-mediated rabies: an overview of performance and a proposed strategy for various settings. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016; 46:107–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.03.016.

9. Eggerbauer E., de Benedictis P., Hoffmann B., Mettenleiter T.C., Schlottau K., Ngoepe E.C., Sabeta C.T., Freuling C.M., Müller T. Evaluation of six commercially available rapid immunochromatographic tests for the diagnosis of rabies in brain material. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016; 10(6):e0004776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004776.

10. Faye M., Dacheux L., Weidmann M., Diop S.A., Loucoubar C., Bourhy H., Sall A.A., Faye O. Development and validation of sensitive realtime RT-PCR assay for broad detection of rabies virus. J. Virol. Methods. 2017; 243:120–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.12.019.

11. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680–5.

12. Léchenne M., Naïssengar K., Lepelletier A., Alfaroukh I.O., Bourhy H., Zinsstag J., Dacheux L. Validation of a rapid rabies diagnostic tool for field surveillance in developing countries. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10(10):e0005010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005010.

13. Manoj S., Mukherjee A., Johri S., Kumar K.V. Recovery from rabies, a universally fatal disease. Mil. Med. Res. 2016; 3:21. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-016-0089-y.

14. Maxwell M.J., Freire de Carvalho M.H., Hoet A.E., Vigilato M.A., Pompei J.C., Cosivi O., Del Rio Vilas V.J. Building the road to a regional zoonoses strategy: A survey of zoonoses programmes in the Americas. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0174175. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174175.

15. Tekki I.S., Ponfa Z.N., Nwosuh C.I., Kumbish P.R., Jonah C.L., Okewole P.A., Shamaki D., Ahmed S.M. Comparative assessment of seller’s staining test (SST) and direct fluorescent antibody test for rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of rabies. Afr. Health Sci. 2016; 16(1):123–7. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v16i1.16.


Review

For citations:


Efimova M.A., Khaertynov K.S., Arslanova A.F., Akhmadeev R.M., Nikitin A.I., Gumerov V.G., Shuralev E.A. Isolation, Purification and Evaluation of Serological Activity of Rabies Virus Antigens. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2017;(4):27-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2017-4-27-31

Views: 1355


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)