Preview

Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections

Advanced search

Variability of cef Genes in Toxigenic and Non-Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 Strains

https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2017-4-50-55

Abstract

Objective of the investigation was a comparative bioinformatics analysis of Vibrio cholerae О1 Cef (CHO cell elongating factor) genes and proteins. Materials and methods. 36 Vibrio cholerae О1 strains from the Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute collection have been utilized. DNA sequencing was conducted on the MiSeq platform (Illumina); gene identification and analysis was carried out by means of BioEdit 7.2.5, BLASTN 2.2.29, BLASTP, MEGA 7, Vector NTI Advance 11 software programs. Results and conclusions. The data obtained confirmed Cef to be rather conserved in choleragenic strains (carrying cholera toxin genes ctxAB as a part of genome-integrated CTX prophage): all of them shared closely related prototype alleles cefС or cefЕ1. The Е1 allele was also revealed in ctxAB– strains carrying the pre-CTX prophage and in a single strain lacking both prophages. In the rest of CTX–/pre-CTX– V. cholerae four novel cef variants, that were not previously described, have been identified, two of which (E2 and E3), belonging to the Russian isolates, appeared to be unique, while for the two others absolute homologues were found in NCBI. In this connection several strains which caused severe cholera-like diseases in humans were placed in the group of cefЕ4 host strains. Since Cef is one of pathogenicity/persistence factors of cholera vibrios, we presume that conservation of its altered variants in the course of natural selection embodies a certain biological sense in respect of possible acquisition of qualities, significant for realization of both pathogenic and persistence potential.

About the Authors

E. V. Monakhova
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
117/40, M.Gor`kogo St., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation


R. V. Pisanov
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
117/40, M.Gor`kogo St., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation


S. V. Titova
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
117/40, M.Gor`kogo St., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation


M. I. Ezhova
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
117/40, M.Gor`kogo St., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation


S. A. Ivanov
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
117/40, M.Gor`kogo St., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation


References

1. Monakhova E.V. [Cholera vibrio virulence strategy and ways of its realization]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2013; 4:60–8.

2. Monakhova E.V., Pisanov R.V., Mazrukho A.B., Markina O.V., Alekseeva L.P. [Characterization of Vibrio cholerae Cef (CHO cell elongating factor): bioinformatics analysis and experimental data]. Mol. Genet. Mikrobiol. Virusol. 2012; 2:10–4.

3. Pisanov R.V., Monakhova E.V., Shalu O.A. [Point mutation in Vibrio cholerae O139 cef (CHO cell elongating factor) gene alters the substrate specificity of its product]. Genetika. 2012; 48(2):245–8.

4. Islam A., Labbate M., Djordjevic S.P., Alam M., Darling A., Melvold J., Holmes A.J., Johura F.T., Cravioto A., Charles I.G., Stokes H.W. Indigenous Vibrio cholerae strains from a non-endemic region are pathogenic. Open Biol. 2013; 3:120181. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603452. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.120181.

5. Lugo M.R., Merrill A.R. The father, son and cholix toxin: the third member of the DT group mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin family. Toxins (Basel). 2015; 7(8):2757–72. DOI: 10.3390/toxins7082757.

6. McCardell B.A., Kothary M.H., Hall R.N., Sathyamoorthy V. Identification of a CHO-elongating factor produced by Vibrio cholerae O1. Microb. Pathog. 2000; 29(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1006/mpat.2000.0361.

7. McCardell B.A., Sathyamoorthy V., Michalski J., Lavu S., Kothary M., Livezey J., Kaper J.B., Hall R. Cloning, expression and characterization of the CHO cell elongating factor (Cef) from Vibrio cholerae O1. Microb. Pathog. 2002; 32(4):165–72. DOI: 10.1006/mpat.2001.0492.

8. Osama A., Gan H.M., The C.S., Yap K.P., Thong K.L. Genome sequence and comparative genomics analysis of a Vibrio cholerae O1 strain isolated from a cholera patient in Malaysia. J. Bacteriol. 2012; 194(24):6933. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01832-12.

9. Saha P.K., Koley H., Mukhopadhyay A.K., Bhattacharya S.R., Nair G.B., RamaKrishnan S.T., Takeda Y. Nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Inaba biotype El Tor associated with a cluster of cases of cholera in Southern India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996; 34(5):1114–7.

10. Vezzulli L., Pruzzo C., Huq A., Colwell R.R. Environmental reservoirs of Vibrio cholerae and their role in cholera. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010; 2(1):27–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00128.x.


Review

For citations:


Monakhova E.V., Pisanov R.V., Titova S.V., Ezhova M.I., Ivanov S.A. Variability of cef Genes in Toxigenic and Non-Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 Strains. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2017;(4):50-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2017-4-50-55

Views: 778


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0370-1069 (Print)
ISSN 2658-719X (Online)