Improvement of the Procedure for Sanitary and Quarantine Control of Ships in the Seaports
https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2018-2-84-89
Abstract
Objective of the work is to analyze the procedure of ship sanitary and quarantine control in the Rostov Region seaports in order to identify the risks for sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population and to improve communication process between the authorized ports. Materials and methods. Ship sanitary and quarantine control data on 8314 ships that arrived at Rostov-on-Don, Azov and Taganrog sea border checkpoints were used, considering possible risks for the sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population. Results and conclusions. The key risks for decision-making whether to perform ship sanitary and quarantine control at the sea border checkpoints are identified. At the stage of the implementation of IHR (2005) it is necessary to consider the ship sanitary and quarantine control at the sea border checkpoints as an unscheduled inspection; availability of preliminary information on the absence of valid sanitary certificates on ships arriving from abroad to be the ground for carrying out ship sanitary and quarantine control at the sea border checkpoints. In order to improve the communication process between authorized ports it is necessary to insert the results of the inspections into ship’s sanitary certificates with issuance of the revealed risks forms.
About the Authors
Yu. V. Ryzhkov
Rospotrebnadzor Administration in the Rostov Region, Rostov-on- Don
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. D. Pakskina
Federal Service for Surveillance in the Sphere of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Moskvitina
Rostov-on-Don Research Anti-Plague Institute, Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. [International Health Regulations (2005)]. WHO, Geneva; 2007. 82 p.
2. [International Health Regulations (2005): Handbook for Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation Certificates]. WHO, 2012 (cited 28 Mar 2018). [Internet]. Available from: http:// www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html.
3. Miselle R.N., Leal S.B., Serpa Zh.S., Sachivkina N.P. [Haemorrhagic Dengue Fever: A Case Report From Brazil]. Bulletin of the Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Medicine Series. 2014; 1:85–91.
4. [Concerning epidemiological risks emerging during the preparation to the World Cup and sanitary protection of the territory of the Russian Federation. Review of epidemiological risks around the world, associated with preparation to the XXI Football World Cup in 2018 in the Russian Federation]. [Internet]. (Cited 13 Jan 2018). Available from: http://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/upload/iblock/cb6/ ob-epidemiologich.-riskakh-pri-podgotovke-k-chm-i-san.-okhranyterr-rf-23.01.18.
5. [List of infectious diseases found in the countries where un- favorable epidemiological situation on the diseases requiring SQC in the points of entry across the State border of the Russian Federation is registered]. [Internet]. (Cited 17 Apr 2018). Available from: http://09. rospotrebnadzor.ru/content/o-perechne-infekcionnyh-bolezney-istran-v-kotoryh-otmecheno-epidemiologicheskoe.
6. Popova A.Yu., Ezhlova E.B., Demina Yu.V., Toporkov A.V., Viktorov D.V., Smelyansky V.P., Zhukov K.V., Boroday N.V., Shpak I.M., Kulichenko A.N., Mikheev V.N., Maleev V.V., Shipulin A.G. [Zika fever: the current state of the issue]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2016; 1:5–12. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2016-1-5-12.
7. Popova A.Yu., Toporkov V.P., Smolensky V.Yu., Pakskina N.D., Udovichenko S.K., Karnaukhov I.G., Shiyanova A.E., Shcherbakova S.A., Kutyrev V.V. [Effectiveness of international health regulations in prevention and control of emergency situations of sanitary-epidemiological and biological character]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2017; 2:5–8. DOI: 10.21055/0370-1069-2017-2-5-8.
8. Ryzhkov Yu.V., Solov’ev M.Yu. [Risk management in sanitary quarantine control]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2012; 3:33–7.
9. Cholera, 2014. Wkly Epidem. Rec. 2015; 90(40):517–29.
10. Cholera, 2015. Wkly Epidem. Rec. 2016; 91(38):433–40.
11. Cholera, 2016. Wkly Epidem. Rec. 2017; 92(36):521–36.
12. Dengue/DHF update (21): Americas, Asia, Pacific [Internet]. 10 Jul 2015 (cited 26 Apr 2018). Archive Number: 20150712.3505744. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
13. Dengue/DHF update (25): Americas, Asia [Internet]. 18 Jul – 5 Aug 2015 (cited 13 Apr 2018). Archive Number: 20150810.3569950. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
14. Lassa fever – Nigeria (09) [Internet]. 2016 Jan 25 (cited 27 Jan 2018) Archive Number: 20160125.3962747. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
15. Lassa Fever – Nigeria (10): (KN) [Internet]. 27 Dec 2015 (cited 23 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20151227.3893839. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
16. Malaria – Cameroon: (EN) [Internet]. 26 Oct 2013. (cited 25 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20131026.2022649. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
17. Malaria – Nigeria [Internet]. 02 May 2012 (cited 26 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 0120502.1120714. Available from: http:// www.promedmail.org.
18. Poliomyelitis update (07): Nigeria cVDPV environmental sample, EpiCore responses [Internet]. (Cited 23 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20160513.4220460. Available from: http://www.promed- mail.org
19. Poliomyelitis update (11): Nigeria (BO) [Internet]. 11 Aug 2016 (cited 22 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20160811.4410331. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
20. Shearer F.M., Longbottom J., Browne A.J., Pigott D.M., Brady O.J., Kraemer M.U.G., Marinho F., Yactayo S., de Araújo V.E.M., da Nóbrega A.A., Fullman N., Ray S.E., Mosser J.F., Stanaway J.D., Lim S.S., Reiner R.C. Jr, Moyes C.L., Hay S.I., Golding N. Existing and potential infection risk zones of yellow fever worldwide: a modelling analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2018; 6(3):270–8. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30024-X.
21. Yellow fever – Africa (06): Nigeria, fake cards [Internet]. (Cited 23 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20160129.3977690. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
22. Yellow fever – Americas (04): Brazil (TO) [Internet]. 18 Jul 2014 (cited 22 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20140718.2618993. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
23. Yellow Fever – Americas (14): Brazil (RN) susp., RFI [Internet]. 30 Dec 2015 (cited 25 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20151230.3902261. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
24. Yellow fever – Americas (15): Brazil (SP) monkey [Internet]. 28 Dec 2016 (cited 23 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20161228.4728746. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
25. Zika virus – Brazil (16): (PE) microcephaly cause undeter- mined [Internet]. 18 Nov 2015 (cited 28 Jan 2018). Archive Number: 20151118.3799192. Available from: http://www.promedmail.org.
Review
For citations:
Ryzhkov Yu.V., Pakskina N.D., Moskvitina E.A. Improvement of the Procedure for Sanitary and Quarantine Control of Ships in the Seaports. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2018;(2):84-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2018-2-84-89
Views:
816
Email this article 