Analysis of Implementation of the Requirements for Provision of Biological Safety at a Potentially Hazardous Facility
https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2018-2-95-100
Abstract
Discussed are the problems of implementation of requirements for the provision of biological safety at a potentially hazardous biological facility by the example of Federal Budgetary Institution of Science “State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology” of the Rospotrebnadzor. Identified are the necessary and sufficient organizational-andpreventive and control measures and procedures on management of works with microorganisms of the I-IV groups of pathogenicity (hazard) in isolated labs of the Center. Issues associated with exploitation of biological safety engineering systems and assessment of their protective efficiency, problems of medical support of the activities and response to the emergency situations of biological character with the involvement of doctors from a specialized medical wing of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of the Russian Federation, serving the facility on a constant basis, are analyzed. Determined have been approaches to and principles of establishing the requirements for the system of biological safety at a potentially hazardous biological facility taking into account all the range of biological risks when working with microorganisms. Complex approach and realization of appropriate necessary measures in the sphere of biological safety provision, creating an environment for the reduction of biological risks up to acceptable level while working with pathogenic microorganisms, can be an effective solution of the problem on the whole.
About the Authors
E. A. Tyurin
State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. V. Khramov
State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. A. Dyatlov
State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Borovik R.V., Dmitriev G.A., Kolombet L.V., Pobedimskaya D.D., Remnev Yu.V., Tyurin E.A., Fedorov N.A. [Basics of Biological Safety: Principles and Practice]. Educational and Methodological Guide. M.: “Meditsina dlya vas”; 2008. 303 p.
2. Dmitrieva V.A., Boronin A.M., Dmitriev V.V., Dobrokhotsky O.N., Zharikov G.A., Kolombet L.V., Nagolkin A.V., Tyurin E.A., Khramov M.V. [Study Guide on Biosafety]. Tula: “TulGU”; 2013. 500 p.
3. Karniz A.F., Konyshev I.S., Sobol’ V.N., Zheleznyak V.N. [Biological safety. New approaches to classification of modern bio- logical threats]. Meditsina Katastrof. 2011; 2:51–2.
4. Kostyukova T.A., Smolensky V.Yu., Lyapin M.N. [Deve¬ lopment of instruction and methodical data basis of the institution as an element of biosafety provision as regards works with pathogenic biological agents]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2014; 3:25–9.
5. Lyapin M.N., Kutyrev V.V. [Relevant problems of biosafe- ty]. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii, i Immunobiologii. 2013; 1:97–102.
6. Lyapin M.N., Sukhonosov I.Yu., Ezhov I.N., Toporkov A.V., Toporkov V.P., Chesnokova M.V., Kosilko S.A., Zakhlebnaya O.D. [Epidemiological Situation Control at Biohazardous Facility]. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections]. 2011; 3:18–23.
7. Onishchenko G.G., Kutyrev V.V., editors. [Biological Safety. Terms and Definitions]. 2nd Edition, revised and updated. M.: “Meditsina”; 2011. 152 p.
8. Onishchenko G.G., Smolensky V.Yu., Ezhlova E.B., Demina Yu.V., Toporkov V.P., Toporkov A.V., Lyapin M.N., Kutyrev V.V. [Conceptual framework of biological safety . Part 1.]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk. 2013; 68(10):4–13. DOI: 10.15690/vramn.v68i10.781.
9. [WHO Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines]. 3rd edition. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2004. 201 p.
10. Tyurin E.A. [Biological safety factors]. Biozashchita i Biobezopasnost’. 2010; 2(3):34–9.
11. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 5th Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institutes of Health. HHS Publication No. (CDC) 21–1112; 2009. 360 р.
12. Blaine J.W. Establishing a national biological laboratory safety and security monitoring program. Biosecur. Bioterror. 2012; 10(4):396–400. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0054.
13. Colf L.A. Preparing for Nontraditional Biothreats . Health Security. 2016; 14(1):7–12. DOI: 10.1089/hs.2015.0045.
14. Homer L.C., Alderman T.S., Blair H.A., Brocard A.S., Broussard E.E., Ellis R.P., Frerotte J., Low E.W., McCarthy T.R., McCormick J.M., Newton J.M., Rogers F.C., Schlimgen R., Stabenow J.M., Stedman D., Warfield C., Ntiforo C.A., Whetstone C.T., Zimmerman D., Barkley E. Guidelines for biosafety training pro- grams for workers assigned to BSL-3 research laboratories. Biosecur. Bioterror. 2013; l1(1):10–9. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0038.
15. Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines. 3-rd Edition. Canada; 2004. 113 р.
16. Pastorino В., Xavier de Lamballerie, Remi Charrel Biosafety and Biosecurity in European Containment Level 3 Laboratories: Focus on French recent progress and essential requirements. Front Public Health. 2017; 5:121. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00121.
Review
For citations:
Tyurin E.A., Khramov M.V., Dyatlov I.A. Analysis of Implementation of the Requirements for Provision of Biological Safety at a Potentially Hazardous Facility. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2018;(2):95-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2018-2-95-100
Views:
1269
Email this article 