Comparative Analysis of Immunochemical Methods Applied for Studies of Pathogenic Burkholderia Antigens
https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2012-3-82-85
Abstract
Studied are immunochemical properties of antigen preparations, the spectrum and molar masses of the components contained. Demonstrated is the significance of vertical SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunodiffusion test, immunoelectrophoresis assay, rocket immunoelectrophoresis with specific sera for identification and differentiation of
Burkholderia. Rocket immunoelectrophoresis should be viewed as the most informative method which allows for differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic for humans
Burkholderia under usual terms.
Burkholderia. Rocket immunoelectrophoresis should be viewed as the most informative method which allows for differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic for humans
Burkholderia under usual terms.
About the Authors
I. I. Korsakova
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. P. Khrapova
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. M. Napalkova
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. V. Lomova
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. M. Drefs
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. A. Goloseev
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. V. Bulatova
Volgograd Research Anti-Plague Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Antonov V.A., Ilyukhin V.I., Senina T.V., Loboyko A.D., Tkachenko G.A., Zinchenko O.V. et al. [Phenotype and genotype identification of Burkholderia cepacia bacteria complex]. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunibiol. 2008; 4:78–82.
2. Ilyukhin V.I., Senina T.V., Plekhanova N.G., Antonov V.A., Merinova L.K., Seimova I.K. [Burkholderia thailandensis: biological properties, iden- tification and taxonomic position]. Mol. Genet. Mikrobiol. Virusol. 2002; 1:7–11.
3. Korsakova I.I., Napalkova G.M., Khrapova N.P., Piven’ N.N., Lomova L.V. [Method of differentiation between pathogenic and non-patho- genic Burkholderia]. RF Patent 2378360.
4. Piven’ N.N., Avrorova I.V., Zhukova S.I., Alekseev V.V., Khrapova N.P., Korsakova I.I. et al. [Immunogenicity of surface and capsular Burkholderia mallei antigens]. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunibiol. 2007; 1:47–52.
5. Piven’ N.N., Ilyukhin V.I., Zamarin A.E., Alekseev V.V., Vasil’ev V.P. [Adequate selection of antigens in case of serodiagnostics of experimental melioidosis]. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunibiol. 2007; 2:49–53.
6. Chukhlantsev D.A., Marakulin I.V., Darmov I.V. [Application of PCR for identification and interspecific differentiation of glanders and melioidosis etiological agents]. Probl. Osobo Opasn. Infek. 2008; 97:63–6.
7. Bossi P., Guihot A., Bricare F. Emerging or re-emerging infections that can be used for bioterrorism. Presse Med. 2005; 34(2, Pt. 2):149–55.
8. Elvin S.J., Healy G.D., Williamson E.D., Eyles J.E., Smither S.J., Sarkar-Tyson M. et al. Immunogenic agents against Burkholderia pseudomallei and/or Burkholderia mallei, comprising lipopolysaccharide, capsular polysaccharide and/or proteins from Burkholderia pseudomallei. Patent WO/2007/036735, PCTT/GB2006/003628, 05.04.2007.
9. Sarkar-Tyson M., Titball R.W. Progress toward development of vaccines against melioidosis: A review. Clin. Ther. 2010; 32(8):1437–45.
10. Westermeier R. Electrophoresis in practice: A guide to methods and applications of DNA and protein separations. 4th ed. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag; 2005. 406 p.
Review
For citations:
Korsakova I.I., Khrapova N.P., Napalkova G.M., Lomova L.V., Drefs N.M., Goloseev Yu.A., Bulatova T.V. Comparative Analysis of Immunochemical Methods Applied for Studies of Pathogenic Burkholderia Antigens. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2012;(3(113)):82-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2012-3-82-85
Views:
497
Email this article 